|
|
Post by benziger on Jan 17, 2020 15:24:54 GMT
Categories, subjects or tabs in the storefront is an old wish of us. It was discussed many times, had a lot of kidos in the very old forum, ... Now, the suggestion is back and vote is open at Lulu's:
and the same idea a second time:
Just follow this links and vote for them. Maybe you have to register or to log in.
Maybe not so much as here: |
|
|
|
Post by Retread-Retired-Cameron on Jan 17, 2020 15:53:28 GMT
I didn't see any way to vote on either, and when I tried to log in to vote it tried to redirect me to a password reset, twice.
|
|
|
|
Post by benziger on Jan 20, 2020 10:59:12 GMT
I simply clicked on the number of votes on the left. Then the site asked me for my/an e-mail address and forwarded me to the vote registration.
|
|
|
|
Post by Retread-Retired-Cameron on Jan 20, 2020 17:31:48 GMT
Got it that time.
The design rationale behind that 'universal login system' leaves a bit to be desired.
|
|
|
|
Post by benziger on Jan 20, 2020 23:31:30 GMT
I agree, Sphinx-Cameron, I have now a Lulu login, a forum login (as in the past), then a vote login and could have a beta-/x-login, ...
But: If we discuss ideas here and move them then to the official place at Lulu's, we can vote for each other to support the ideas.
I took a look around a little bit and then supported generously. Everything that I think is very good, everything that I think is good and everything that I think fits Lulu - even if I don't need it. Of course I hope that my ideas, which are important to me, will be supported by others too. I will publish them here again an other day: Various additional formats (also similar suggestions from others). Who knows what he will need in two years. If it's already there, it's useful. And Lulu earns money...
|
|
|
|
Post by Retread-Retired-Cameron on Jan 20, 2020 23:47:17 GMT
I learned a long time ago to hang onto certain things I didn't think I'd need again, because I'd found out the hard way such items often were needed at a future date.
Back when I did System Support I noticed some clunky design aspects and upon asking I learned the clunkiest parts of the system were ideas people in management had insisted upon as 'key features'.
The two key factors on any system are what do the end-users need combined with ease of use. If management isn't using the system on a daily basis, management really doesn't need to interfere. As well, it doesn't matter how easy it is for the developers to use, if the end-users are constantly running into issues then the system's design is substandard.
It will be interesting to see more ideas.
|
|
